MKCSL Player Rankings 2002/2003
- Milton Keynes Snooker Club First Division
Ranking Team Player Singles Frames Number of Breaks
Pos Points Name Played Won Lost 30+ 40+ 50+ 60+ 70+ 80+ 90+ 100+
1 80 MKSC Five Steps Mick Wheeley 25 21 84% 4 16% 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 75 BCC Hawks Paul Lewis 26 21 81% 5 19% 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 58 MKSC Hotshots Greg Penny 23 17 74% 6 26% 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 49 MKSC Allsorts Nevil Underwood 26 18 69% 8 31% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 48 MKSC Five Steps Shaun Green 9 7 78% 2 22% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 47 BCC Hawks Daniel Cordnor 24 16 67% 8 33% 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
47 MKSC Hotshots Terry Taylor 25 17 68% 8 32% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 34 MKSC Windowcraft Mark Harvey 24 15 62% 9 38% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 33 MKSC Royals Andy Peacock 19 12 63% 7 37% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
33 MKSC Royals Grahame Wild 19 12 63% 7 37% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 32 MKSC Hotshots Dan Bradnam 23 14 61% 9 39% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12 31 MKSC Royals Michael Boyle 16 10 62% 6 38% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 19 MKSC Hotshots Dave Church 22 12 55% 10 45% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 Tesco Tornadoes Phil Reddy 24 13 54% 11 46% 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 18 BCC Hawks Joe Saunders 26 14 54% 12 46% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 16 MKSC Five Steps Trevor Ward 13 7 54% 6 46% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 15 MKSC Royals Ian Page 17 9 53% 8 47% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Tesco Tornadoes Jason Reynolds 19 10 53% 9 47% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 14 Tesco Tornadoes Roger Decoteau 23 12 52% 11 48% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 8 BCC Hawks Daniel Rance 25 12 48% 13 52% 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 6 MKSC Five Steps Dave Osborne 21 10 48% 11 52% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 MKSC Five Steps Keith Decort 23 11 48% 12 52% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 MKSC Windowcraft Lee Parkins 23 11 48% 12 52% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 5 MKSC Windowcraft Ray Harvey 15 7 47% 8 53% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 1 Herald Spiders Adam Simpson 20 9 45% 11 55% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 0 MKSC Royals Ray Wilson 16 7 44% 9 56% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
27 -1 MKSC Windowcraft Terry Connell 14 6 43% 8 57% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 -3 Herald Spiders Terry Calvert 21 9 43% 12 57% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
29 -10 MKSC Royals Alan Page 16 6 38% 10 62% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 -11 Tesco Tornadoes Robert Metherall 6 2 33% 4 67% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 -12 MKSC Allsorts Iain Ripo 24 9 38% 15 62% 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
32 -15 MKSC Allsorts Alan Senior 17 6 35% 11 65% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
33 -18 Tesco Tornadoes Christopher Stratton 10 3 30% 7 70% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
34 -19 Tesco Tornadoes Andrew Robinson 13 4 31% 9 69% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-19 MKSC Windowcraft Brian Chapman 4 1 25% 3 75% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-19 Herald Spiders Dave Claxton 18 6 33% 12 67% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-19 MKSC Hotshots J Davenport 4 1 25% 3 75% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
38 -23 MKSC Windowcraft James Gregg 24 8 33% 16 67% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
39 -25 Herald Spiders Mick J Cockram 17 5 29% 12 71% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40 -28 MKSC Allsorts Cole Brooker 23 7 30% 16 70% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
41 -29 Herald Spiders Terry Oldfield 21 6 29% 15 71% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
42 -31 MKSC Hotshots Graham Drake 6 1 17% 5 83% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 -34 Tesco Tornadoes Robert Turner 3 3 100% 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
44 -42 MKSC Allsorts Alan Cutler 1 0 0% 1 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-42 BCC Hawks G Gradwell 1 0 0% 1 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
46 -46 Herald Spiders Glen Oldfield 3 0 0% 3 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
47 -54 MKSC Five Steps Pam Osborne 13 1 8% 12 92% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
48 -62 MKSC Allsorts Julia Paul 11 0 0% 11 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

League Ranking points formula
You must have played at least one singles frame to be ranked
Singles Frames Won +2 Points per frame
Singles Frames Lost -2 Points per frame
Breaks between 30-39 +1 Point per break
Breaks between 40-49 +2 Points per break
Breaks between 50-59 +4 Points per break
Breaks between 60-69 +5 Points per break
Breaks between 70-79 +6 Points per break
Breaks between 80-89 +8 Points per break
Breaks between 90-99 +10 Points per break
Breaks of 100+ +12 Points per break
When 4 or more singles frames have been played
Percentage of singles frames won +0-100 points
According to which division you are in
Premier A -0 points
Premier B -20 points
First -40 points
Second -60 points
Third -80 points
For the 2002-2003 season please note the following:
Fixtures were re-generated and are in a different order.
As a result anything to do with order of play is affected.
This mainly affects doubles penalties.
Late cards, missing cards and postponed matches are not shown.